He had a good year - that is not a turn around. Happy with this year.

I do not believe his approach is will build a sustainable model that will compete at the top of the PAC 12 every year. Poor recruiting and questionable coaching hires.

He is 1-4 in the PAC 12 this year - how do you explain that.

Gene Chizik won a national championship and was fired two years later. One good outcome does not mean continued success.

I think Leavitt had a lot to do with the success of the team.

In response to this post by 241Volcano

Posted: 10/24/2017 at 2:37PM

Any detractors able to explain how Mac turned dumpster fire into 10-2? -- 241Volcano 10/24/2017 12:20PM

Good! -- IdaBuff 10/24/2017 3:15PM

When great coaches rebuild and turn around a program -- SamBuff 10/24/2017 2:52PM

Leavitt was hands down the reason for any success last year -- Buffalo 2 10/24/2017 3:38PM

Re: Leavitt was hands down the reason for any success last year -- HallelujahBuff 10/24/2017 4:01PM

Said Leavitt and his agent on their flight to Oregon ** -- Bufftime70 10/24/2017 3:44PM

Stop with the Leavitt nonsense!!!! He’s gone and he was NOT the savior -- Bufftime70 10/24/2017 3:36PM

He had a good year - that is not a turn around. Happy with this year. -- Buff101 10/24/2017 2:37PM

Yes -- hawg1 10/24/2017 12:29PM

Simplistic IMO -- Gonzo 10/24/2017 4:06PM

So MM deserves ZERO credit? -- EBN 10/24/2017 2:23PM

Senior leadership and experience are not our of his control -- bufffantheman 10/24/2017 3:33PM

I didn’t say that at all. I congratulated him many, many times last year. ** -- hawg1 10/24/2017 2:48PM

Re: Yes -- cbrobuff1 10/24/2017 1:06PM

Not solely responsible for last year, but you can’t deny his contributions -- hawg1 10/24/2017 2:17PM

Can't have it both ways, Leavitt benefited from your list of reasons -- Bufftime70 10/24/2017 12:49PM

This is not about Leavitt. But yes he benefitted by all -- hawg1 10/24/2017 12:55PM

31, 49, 33, 24, 37 -- 93Buff 10/24/2017 12:53PM

That's what I'm saying. ** -- Buffalo Bob 10/24/2017 1:51PM

Great Points -- Bud Kilmer 10/24/2017 1:21PM

Yes, that D is not good, but has improved. And will continue to do so. -- hawg1 10/24/2017 12:58PM

Tough to use the word fluke when you go from 4-9 to 10-4 -- Bufftime70 10/24/2017 1:20PM

It appears is was an aberration (fluke). There is no -- hawg1 10/24/2017 2:00PM

So jaded. ** -- 241Volcano 10/24/2017 12:36PM

Based on evidence. Dispute the points. ** -- hawg1 10/24/2017 12:38PM

He had a good year - that is not a turn around. Happy with this year.

Insert a Link