Where Colorado Buffalo alumni, fans and friends come to chat all things CU. Go Buffs!

Football Message Board

BarkingDogBuff

Joined: 9/22/11 Posts: 6011
Likes: 632


A couple things


First this argument is based on the premis that conferences are football and football only. The P5 is football centric certainly, but the PAC12 is the Conference of Champions. NCAA titles in basketball, baseball (I'm guessing), cross country ...you get my point. Football pays for it all, so I understand where the POV comes from, but being in the PAC12 is more than football, IMO. I think the argument of dropping the poorest performing football teams is an absurd notion.

G5 schools get in. Expansion is one way, though clearly those spots are VERY limited. During the BCS, spots were made available for G5 schools if eligible, in game if not conference. OU v BSU comes to mind, great game. Still the big money is in Tv deals and G5 just doesn't have the clout to get it. I get that G5 thinks it unfair, because they have teams that compete, "more with less", but generally, it's the teams in the P5 that built college football, positioned themselves wisely in the early years. WSU in Pullman for instance, why them? Great school? Meh. Great college town? I haven't been, not planning to, I have Boulder 12 miles down the road ...WSU built the PAC, 100 year members, good investment. Very different than the history CSU has with conference alignment, including a stab at being indy. No early investment. They are G5 for a reason, as I suspect most G5 schools are.

(In response to this post by cswilliam)

Posted: 03/27/2016 at 11:03AM



+0

Insert a Link

Enter the title of the link here:


Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:


Current Thread:
 
  
Conference Realignment (Again) -- carlosphat 03/26/2016 02:19AM
  Pimping your blog, captain chaos? ** -- SoCal Bob 03/26/2016 1:28PM
  Exactly my thought -- BarkingDogBuff 03/26/2016 8:19PM
  Here is an item from the article that I didn't like. -- buffemup 03/26/2016 11:59AM
  A couple things -- BarkingDogBuff 03/27/2016 11:03AM
  There are always self justifying rationales. -- cswilliam 03/27/2016 1:42PM
  I'm listening ...how so? ** -- BarkingDogBuff 03/27/2016 2:28PM
  Let's try a simple thought experiment -- cswilliam 03/27/2016 5:17PM
  Ok -- BarkingDogBuff 03/28/2016 10:28AM
  You make my point -- cswilliam 03/29/2016 01:52AM
  I tried -- BarkingDogBuff 03/29/2016 09:37AM
  Re: Ok -- Irish Buff 03/28/2016 10:33AM
  Why leave out women's sports? -- BarkingDogBuff 03/28/2016 10:31AM
  Re: Why leave out women's sports? -- McKelvie 03/28/2016 9:33PM
  Your data is tilted -- cswilliam 03/29/2016 08:27AM
  Re: Your data is tilted -- McKelvie 03/29/2016 11:30AM
  REALLY?! the Ram/Husker doesn't agree? Noooooo...really? -- BarkingDogBuff 03/28/2016 10:36PM
  LOL -- BuffsIn2016 03/26/2016 11:16AM
  That article is a boat load of crap and hurt my eyes -- WoodbadgeBuff 03/26/2016 11:07AM
vm309