Where Colorado Buffalo alumni, fans and friends come to chat all things CU. Go Buffs!

Off Topic Message Board

BarkingDogBuff

Joined: 09/22/2011 Posts: 7284
Likes: 1272


Re:carrier attack force group


Hadn't thought about that use, but yeah, could get the whole group at once, and if the attack came with numbers, there's no way to stop them all.

The article said it's intended purpose is deprive enemies of port cities, and is being developed as an asymmetric response the US development of a missal shield. (which would destabilize Russia, triad of ground sea and air nuclear forces, and the vast majority of which are missals based, diminishing a mutually assured nuclear response) It is considered a tactical devise but surely it can be used strategically as well, and for all intents and purposes, attacking a port city is a strategic deployment, not an attack on counter force materiel.

[Post edited by BarkingDogBuff at 12/29/2015 1:39PM]

(In response to this post by buffdad)

Posted: 12/29/2015 at 12:50PM



+0

Insert a Link

Enter the title of the link here:


Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:


Current Thread:
  There goes the carrier attack force group ** -- buffdad 12/29/2015 10:55AM
  Re:carrier attack force group -- BarkingDogBuff 12/29/2015 12:50PM
  Modern tech has made much of what we consider -- buffdad 12/29/2015 5:54PM
  Re: Modern tech has made much of what we consider -- Buffs4Ever 01/01/2016 12:10AM
  Mosul is the next offensive -- BarkingDogBuff 01/01/2016 07:12AM
  Re: Modern tech...I mulled this -- BarkingDogBuff 12/31/2015 10:35AM
  I can see you have given it -- buffdad 12/31/2015 11:58AM
  Ted Koppel, recently spoke about... -- BarkingDogBuff 12/31/2015 3:04PM
vm311