You seem to have taken my comments in reply to cswilliam on a tangent. The alleged Russian collusion was a hoax. I didn't mention the Mueller investigation in my comments. The indictments and subsequent 7 guilty pleas and one conviction from the Mueller investigation resulted from various activity that could not be linked to any alleged collusion. The final Mueller report found no collusion with Russia. The Steele dossier was a fake paid for by Clinton. The alleged Russian collusion was a lie. I will believe what I believe and you will believe what you believe. That's the way of our world.

Considering the events on 6 January, 7 or 9 people died who were at the Capitol on that date. The number depends on who does the counting and how they relate the deaths to the events of that date. The claims of an "armed insurrection" are a lie. The only people armed were the police. The only person who died from a gunshot was an unarmed Air Force veteran shot by a police officer. It was alleged that the one police officer who died after the demonstration/riot on 6 January died from being struck on the head on 6 January. That was apparently found to be untrue. The other deaths after 6 January were from various causes, related or unrelated to what the people were doing on that day. People who were at the Capitol that day were foolish and had no business doing what they were doing. It was not an "armed insurrection" in my opinion,

I was replying to a post that claimed I was "creepy" for stating the truth as I see it and another post that claimed my comments were "divisive drivel." My conclusion was that he can't handle the truth. What does that person call it when he perpetuates lies?