What judge are you talking about?
And read the rest of the details. You left out the part where she received a letter the next day declaring the previous one telling her she could vote was a mistake.
Are you intentionally altering the "evidence" in her case to make a (false) point? Is that something y 'all are proud of?
You've referenced a female judge several times, are we following the same story?
|
(
In response to this post by cswilliam)
Posted: 02/06/2022 at 12:41PM