1) The judge, as judges often can be, deserving of a punch in the face for emotional reasoning, assumptions as facts and arrogance. They feel they are untouchable and often are. He's full of you know what with his overconfident assertion. If someone will have my back, legally, I'm happy to be the one to punch him the face.

Easy, my critics, I wouldn't do it. I don't want to mess up my "pretty hands."

2) Even as a moderate/conservative, I think this may have had a little-to-a-lot to do with the legal ruling: "Black Lives Matter activist and... extensive record of felony convictions, including a conviction for tampering with evidence that caused her to permanently lose her voting rights in the state." Sad reality.

Now, before assumptive thinking settles in and you seek to tie me to the whippin' post, I mean that in support of your thinking. I think there was legal and psychological bias against her.

3) A bad legal reputation is very difficult to overcome. You have to be near perfect moving forward to avoid confirmation bias (see, I use it in support of people too). Heuristics mean, jumping to wild conclusions and convincing yourself the facts exist. That's what I believe happened to this woman.

4) Her rap sheet is definitely unsavory. Easssssy! It's a part of her story. Like whatever good Trump has done, his moral and legal failings are part of his story too. Ms. Moses has to own it like he does.

5) cswilliam, my Netbuffs neighbor, no one here is "proud of that."